The Atlas · Chapter 4

Normal Responses

Before an abnormal emission can be recognised, the normal one must be familiar. A healthy cochlea produces a clear, repeatable emission that rises well above the background noise.

A normal TEOAE

The two recordings you will see most often are the TEOAE response waveform and the DPOAE “DP-gram”. After a click, a healthy ear returns a brief, oscillating emission in the first 20 milliseconds or so. It is small, but it is real and it repeats: record it twice and the two traces look alike.

0 ms20 ms
— Normal earrepeat recording
Simulated TEOAE comparison. Educational signal model — not recorded patient data.

A normal DP-gram

The DP-gram plots the emission level against test frequency. In a normal ear every point sits comfortably above the noise floor — the shaded band beneath it.

-20-1001020DP level (dB SPL)1k1.5k2k3k4k6kf2 frequency (Hz)
● DP emission▮ Noise floor
A normal DP-gram. The emission sits comfortably above the noise floor at every test frequency — the margin between the two is the signal-to-noise ratio. Simplified teaching model, not calibrated normative data.

When is an emission “present”?

A response is judged present when two conditions are met together: it must exceed the noise floor by a criterion signal-to-noise ratio, and it must be reproducible. For TEOAEs an acceptable response is commonly described as roughly 3–6 dB above the noise floor; if a reproducible response is not seen at an SNR of at least 3 dB, the outer hair cells of that frequency region cannot be assumed to be functioning normally[10].

-20-1001020DP level (dB SPL)noise floorpresent criterion (+6 dB SNR)2030405060708090stimulus level (dB SPL) →stimulus 65 dB · DP 12 dB · SNR 22 dBPRESENT
The DPOAE input/output function. As the stimulus level rises, the emission does not grow one-for-one — it grows compressively, because the cochlear amplifier adds most of its gain at low levels and little at high ones. A response is judged present only once it clears the noise floor by the criterion signal-to-noise ratio (here 6 dB); below that, absence cannot be told from noise. Simplified educational model (built on the compressive amplifier curve) — not calibrated normative data.

Reproducibility is quantified as the correlation between two independently averaged buffers — often labelled A and B. A high waveform-reproducibility percentage, close to 100%, indicates the two buffers agree and the recorded response is genuine rather than noise[9].

How OAEs map onto the audiogram

Normal emissions correspond to good pure-tone hearing, within limits. TEOAEs are present in about 99% of ears when all pure-tone thresholds are better than 20 dB HL, and are essentially always absent once thresholds exceed 40 dB HL; between roughly 25 and 35 dB HL they may or may not appear. DPOAEs behave similarly, though with stronger primaries a reduced DPOAE can sometimes persist with losses up to 50–60 dB HL[10].

Pure-tone thresholdsExpected TEOAE
Better than 20 dB HLPresent (~99% of ears)
~25–35 dB HLVariable — may be present or absent
Worse than 40 dB HLAbsent

Figures summarise widely cited clinical data[10]; thresholds are approximate and depend on protocol.

Present, present-but-abnormal, absent

Screening reduces the result to pass or refer, but diagnostic interpretation uses three categories. An emission that meets the SNR criterion and falls within the normative amplitude range is present and normal. One that meets the SNR criterion but whose amplitude lies below the normal range is present but abnormal — a meaningful finding that a pass/refer screen would miss. One that fails the SNR criterion is absent. This three-way classification, anchored to frequency-specific normative data, is the basis of the landmark large-scale DPOAE studies[10].

Normal variation: age, sex, and SOAEs

“Normal” is a range, not a single value. Emission amplitudes are notably larger in infants than in adults — by several decibels, more so at high frequencies — which is part of why OAEs work so well for newborn screening. Amplitudes tend to be modestly larger in females than in males, and they decline gradually with age, an effect partly but not entirely explained by accompanying threshold change[11].

The presence of spontaneous emissions is itself a marker of a robust cochlea: ears with SOAEs tend to show larger evoked-emission amplitudes and SNRs. Because of all this variation, the strongest normative comparison is frequency-specific and, ideally, age-appropriate — adult templates can misclassify infant ears, whose emissions are genuinely larger[10].